Artists are lawyering up against AI slop, and some are even winning
TL;DR
Artists whose work has been co-opted by AI are taking to court. | Image: Alex Parkin / The Verge When The Atlantic published a searchable dataset of works used to train AI, Kirk Wallace Johnson, like a lot of artists, looked for his name out of curiosity. And, like a lot of artists, he found it. Essentially, his books, like The Feather Thief and The Fishermen and the Dragon - nonfiction tomes that he spent "five to six years researching, writing, and investigating" - had been pirated and fed to a chatbot.
Nauti's Take
The upside is legal clarity: early court wins start to define what training on other people's work actually costs, and teams shipping AI content have been operating without that. The catch is the evidence, since the report rests on a single source, so scope, companies involved and the actual outcomes are not solidly confirmed.
Teams processing content automatically should document usage rights, source logs and a deletion path.
Sources