---
title: "Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed safety evaluators. Will they really be independent?"
slug: "anthropic-und-openai-holen-externe-sicherheitspruefer-ins-haus-wie-unabhaengig-sind-die"
date: 2026-09-16
category: tech-pub
tags: [openai, anthropic, regulation, ai-safety]
language: en
sources_count: 1
featured: false
publisher: AInauten News
url: https://news.ainauten.com/en/story/anthropic-und-openai-holen-externe-sicherheitspruefer-ins-haus-wie-unabhaengig-sind-die
---

# Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed safety evaluators. Will they really be independent?

**Published**: 2026-09-16 | **Category**: tech-pub | **Sources**: 1

---

## TL;DR

Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed independent safety evaluators inside their AI labs.

---

## Summary

Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed independent safety evaluators inside their AI labs. Groups such as METR and Redwood Research are pushing for access to training checkpoints, evaluation transcripts and employee interviews, plus the right to publish without company edits. Neither company has said which evaluators it will work with, when, or what they will see. Researchers welcome the access but warn about tight testing windows and restrictive NDAs, and argue voluntary commitments ultimately need regulation behind them.

---

## Why it matters

Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed independent safety evaluators inside their AI labs.

---

## Key Points

- Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed independent safety evaluators inside their AI labs.
- Groups such as METR and Redwood Research are pushing for access to training checkpoints, evaluation transcripts and employee interviews, plus the right to publish without company edits.
- Neither company has said which evaluators it will work with, when, or what they will see.
- Researchers welcome the access but warn about tight testing windows and restrictive NDAs, and argue voluntary commitments ultimately need regulation behind them.

---

## Nauti's Take

Outside evaluators with access to training checkpoints would be real progress for AI safety, since risks could surface before a model ships. The catch is that without fixed timelines, publication rights and protection from restrictive NDAs, the setup stays a voluntary gesture that can end at any time. Teams building on Claude or ChatGPT should watch for the first published evaluation reports before we treat this as a trust signal.

---


## FAQ

**Q:** What is Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed safety evaluators. Will they really be independent? about?

**A:** Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed independent safety evaluators inside their AI labs.

**Q:** Why does it matter?

**A:** Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed independent safety evaluators inside their AI labs.

**Q:** What are the key takeaways?

**A:** Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed independent safety evaluators inside their AI labs.. Groups such as METR and Redwood Research are pushing for access to training checkpoints, evaluation transcripts and employee interviews, plus the right to publish without company edits.. Neither company has said which evaluators it will work with, when, or what they will see.

---

## Related Topics

- [openai](https://news.ainauten.com/en/tag/openai)
- [anthropic](https://news.ainauten.com/en/tag/anthropic)
- [regulation](https://news.ainauten.com/en/tag/regulation)
- [ai-safety](https://news.ainauten.com/en/tag/ai-safety)

---

## Sources

- [Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed safety evaluators. Will they really be independent?](https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/16/anthropic-and-openai-want-to-embed-safety-evaluators-will-they-really-be-independent/) - TechCrunch AI

---

## About This Article

This article is a synthesis of 1 sources, curated and summarized by AInauten News. We aggregate AI news from trusted sources and provide bilingual (German/English) coverage.

**Publisher**: [AInauten](https://www.ainauten.com) | **Site**: [news.ainauten.com](https://news.ainauten.com)

---

*Last Updated: 2026-09-17*