--- title: "AI use by the US government is ballooning. And the lack of transparency is troubling | Nathan E Sanders and Bruce Schneier" slug: "ai-use-by-the-us-government-is-ballooning-and-the-lack-of-transparency-is-troubling-nathan-e-sanders-and-bruce-schneier" date: 2026-06-15 category: tech-pub tags: [ai-safety] language: en sources_count: 1 featured: false publisher: AInauten News url: https://news.ainauten.com/en/story/ai-use-by-the-us-government-is-ballooning-and-the-lack-of-transparency-is-troubling-nathan-e-sanders-and-bruce-schneier --- # AI use by the US government is ballooning. And the lack of transparency is troubling | Nathan E Sanders and Bruce Schneier **Published**: 2026-06-15 | **Category**: tech-pub | **Sources**: 1 --- ## TL;DR - The OMB disclosed on April 14 that US federal agencies have 3,611 active or planned AI use cases, about 70% more than the final Biden-era inventory, according to Nathan E Sanders and Bruce Schneier. --- ## Summary - The OMB disclosed on April 14 that US federal agencies have 3,611 active or planned AI use cases, about 70% more than the final Biden-era inventory, according to Nathan E Sanders and Bruce Schneier. - Examples include HHS grant screening with Palantir, prison misconduct risk scoring for new inmates, AI support for Veterans Crisis Line calls, and Department of Energy tests around nuclear reactor safety. - The authors do not argue that every government AI use is illegitimate. Their core concern is weak disclosure: thin descriptions, inconsistent high-impact labels, and little meaningful public input. - They point to France, Canada, Washington DC, and California as better models for impact assessment, appeal rights, public consultation, or more transparent AI registries. --- ## Why it matters The OMB disclosed on April 14 that US federal agencies have 3,611 active or planned AI use cases, about 70% more than the final Biden-era inventory, according to Nathan E Sanders and Bruce Schneier. --- ## Key Points - The OMB disclosed on April 14 that US federal agencies have 3,611 active or planned AI use cases, about 70% more than the final Biden-era inventory, according to Nathan E Sanders and Bruce Schneier. - Examples include HHS grant screening with Palantir, prison misconduct risk scoring for new inmates, AI support for Veterans Crisis Line calls, and Department of Energy tests around nuclear reactor safety. - The authors do not argue that every government AI use is illegitimate. Their core concern is weak disclosure: thin descriptions, inconsistent high-impact labels, and little meaningful public input. - They point to France, Canada, Washington DC, and California as better models for impact assessment, appeal rights, public consultation, or more transparent AI registries. --- ## Nauti's Take This is not a government demo stack; it is decision machinery for grants, prisons, crisis lines, and nuclear safety. If you build AI for public agencies, audit trails, appeal paths, and readable registries are product requirements, not paperwork stapled on after launch. --- ## FAQ **Q:** What is AI use by the US government is ballooning. And the lack of transparency is troubling | Nathan E Sanders and Bruce Schneier about? **A:** - The OMB disclosed on April 14 that US federal agencies have 3,611 active or planned AI use cases, about 70% more than the final Biden-era inventory, according to Nathan E Sanders and Bruce Schneier. **Q:** Why does it matter? **A:** The OMB disclosed on April 14 that US federal agencies have 3,611 active or planned AI use cases, about 70% more than the final Biden-era inventory, according to Nathan E Sanders and Bruce Schneier. **Q:** What are the key takeaways? **A:** The OMB disclosed on April 14 that US federal agencies have 3,611 active or planned AI use cases, about 70% more than the final Biden-era inventory, according to Nathan E Sanders and Bruce Schneier.. Examples include HHS grant screening with Palantir, prison misconduct risk scoring for new inmates, AI support for Veterans Crisis Line calls, and Department of Energy tests around nuclear reactor safety.. The authors do not argue that every government AI use is illegitimate. Their core concern is weak disclosure: thin descriptions, inconsistent high-impact labels, and little meaningful public input. --- ## Related Topics - [ai-safety](https://news.ainauten.com/en/tag/ai-safety) --- ## Sources - [AI use by the US government is ballooning. And the lack of transparency is troubling | Nathan E Sanders and Bruce Schneier](https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jun/15/ai-use-by-the-us-government-is-ballooning-and-the-lack-of-transparency-is-troubling) - The Guardian AI --- ## About This Article This article is a synthesis of 1 sources, curated and summarized by AInauten News. We aggregate AI news from trusted sources and provide bilingual (German/English) coverage. **Publisher**: [AInauten](https://www.ainauten.com) | **Site**: [news.ainauten.com](https://news.ainauten.com) --- *Last Updated: 2026-06-15*