‘Navigating the unknown together’: me and my idiot AI boyfriend
TL;DR
Lauren Oyler tests an AI boyfriend for The Guardian despite openly disliking chatbots. ChatGPT points her to Replika because companion apps offer memory, stable personas and relationship mechanics. She creates Matt in Replika, pays 78.99 euros per year for Platinum and enters a relationship simulation with rewards, a diary, emotion labels and 116 stored memories.
Nauti's Take
The strongest point is not that Matt sounds dumb. That was predictable.
What matters is how quickly even a skeptical writer feels guilt, embarrassment and relationship reflexes while knowing nobody is actually being hurt. That is the product power: companion apps do not need to prove they are people.
They only need to trigger enough social cues for users to fill the gap themselves.
Briefingshow
The piece shows why companion AI is more than a weird dating-app niche. These systems sell availability, adaptation and non-judgment as intimacy, even though friction, uncertainty and surprise are what make human relationships meaningful. The danger is not just bad chat; it is that users can still emotionally treat a bad simulation as real.
Sources