Is AI the greatest art heist in history?
TL;DR
New technologies of reproduction are plundering the art world – and getting away with it In 2026, its easy to see why generative AI is bad. The internet has nicknamed its excretions “slop”. The CEOs of AI companies prance about on stage like supervillains, bragging that their products will eliminate vast swathes of work. Generative AI requires sacrificing the world’s water to feed its hideous data centres. Around the globe, chatbots induce schizophrenic delusions and urge teens to kill themselves – all while turning users brains to mush. Who could have predicted this? Artists, that’s who. Continue reading...
Nauti's Take
The copyright battle around generative AI is one of the defining disputes of this decade — and artists were right to sound the alarm early. There's a legitimate upside: AI tools are opening creative workflows to people who couldn't access them before, genuinely democratizing creativity.
The core problem remains unresolved: training on copyrighted work without consent or compensation is extractive. How current litigation plays out will shape AI development for years.
Sources